Writing as well as attempting to publish research is a necessary part of an analyst’s professional life. Notwithstanding, academic writing is not each scientist’s forte; moreover, the obstructions of making commentators acknowledge the discoveries are nerve-wrecking. Submission of a composition to a journal is a major step and news of acknowledgement from the editor is exhilarating. News of dismissal is, on the other hand, extremely discouraging; yet everybody’s paper is denied at one or other time.
Peer survey guarantees publishable quality of research writings. Mostly the process of peer review follows dual blinded refereeing and the identity of writers is kept secret. In dynamic fields, it is not uncommon that the credit for the initially published paper on another finding doesn’t fundamentally head off to the specialist who was the first to finish the work; instead, reaches the person who happened to undertake peer review first. The length of time of the associate audit process doesn’t truly hinge on the substance of the paper itself or the productivity of the creators. It depends, to an extensive degree, on the schedule as well as the workload of the analysts and editors. That is an unreasonable deferral, particularly when you’re in danger of being trumped by a contender. Publishing online may make the process quicker; yet it still takes months for a paper to be published.